Eingang zum Volltext in SciDok


InProceedings (Aufsatz / Paper einer Konferenz etc.) zugänglich unter
URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291-scidok-33766

OpenAccess Statistics: alternative impact measures for Open Access documents? : an examination how to generate interoperable usage information from distributed Open Access services

Herb, Ulrich

Weitere Beteiligte (Hrsg. etc.): Hrsg.: Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa

Quelle: (2010) L' information scientifique et technique dans l'univers numérique : mesures et usages. - Paris : ADBS, 2010, S. 165-178
Dokument 1.pdf (106 KB)

Bookmark bei Connotea Bookmark bei
SWD-Schlagwörter: Open Access , Online-Publizieren , Dokumentenserver , Bibliometrie , Leistungsmessung
Freie Schlagwörter (Deutsch): Wissenschaftliches Publizieren , Szientometrie , Impact-Maße , Metriken
Freie Schlagwörter (Englisch): Scientific Publishing , Scientometrics , Impact Metrics , Performance Measurement , Alternative Impact Metrics , Usage Information , Statistics
Institut: Saarländische Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek
DDC-Sachgruppe: Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
Dokumentart: InProceedings (Aufsatz / Paper einer Konferenz etc.)
ISBN: 978-2-84365-123-6
Sprache: Englisch
Erstellungsjahr: 2010
Publikationsdatum: 28.09.2010
Kurzfassung auf Englisch: Publishing and bibliometric indicators are of utmost relevance for scientists and research institutions as the impact or importance of a publication (or even of a scientist or an institution) is mostly regarded to be equivalent to a citation-based indicator, e.g. in form of the Journal Impact Factor or the Hirsch-Index. Both on an individual and an institutional level performance measurement depends strongly on these impact scores. This contribution shows that most common methods to assess the impact of scientific publications often discriminate Open Access publications — and by that reduce the attractiveness of Open Access for scientists. Assuming that the motivation to use Open Access publishing services (e.g. a journal or a repository) would increase if these services would convey some sort of reputation or impact to the scientists, alternative models of impact are discussed. Prevailing research results indicate that alternative metrics based on usage information of electronic documents are suitable to complement or to relativize citation-based indicators. Furthermore an insight into the project OpenAccess- Statistics OA-S is given. OA-S implemented an infrastructure to collect document-related usage information from distributed Open Access Repositories in an aggregator service in order to generate interoperable document access information according to three standards (COUNTER, LogEc and IFABC). The service also guarantees the deduplication of users and identical documents on different servers. In a second phase it is not only planned to implement added services like recommender features, but also to evaluate alternative impact metrics based on usage patterns of electronic documents.
Lizenz: Standard-Veröffentlichungsvertrag

Home | Impressum | Über SciDok | Policy | Kontakt | Datenschutzerklärung | English