Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen: doi:10.22028/D291-41078
Titel: Prediction of corneal power vectors after cataract surgery with toric lens implantation-A vector analysis
VerfasserIn: Langenbucher, Achim
Szentmáry, Nóra
Cayless, Alan
Wendelstein, Jascha
Hoffmann, Peter
Sprache: Englisch
Titel: PloS One
Bandnummer: 18
Heft: 9
Verlag/Plattform: Plos
Erscheinungsjahr: 2023
DDC-Sachgruppe: 610 Medizin, Gesundheit
Dokumenttyp: Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel
Abstract: Background Intraocular lenses are typically calculated based on a pseudophakic eye model, and for toric lenses (tIOL) a good estimate of corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery is required in addition to the equivalent corneal power. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between the preoperative IOLMaster (IOLM) and the preoperative and postoperative Casia2 (CASIA) tomographic measurements of corneal power in a cataractous population with tIOL implantation, and to predict total power (TP) from the IOLM and CASIA keratometric measurements. Methods The analysis was based on a dataset of 88 eyes of 88 patients from 1 clinical centre before and after tIOL implantation. All IOLM and CASIA keratometric and total corneal power measurements were converted to power vector components, and the differences between preoperative IOLM or CASIA and postoperative CASIA measurements were assessed. Feedforward neural network and multivariate linear regression prediction algorithms were implemented to predict the postoperative total corneal power (as a reference for tIOL calculation) from the preoperative IOLM and CASIA keratometric measurements. Results On average, the preoperative IOLM keratometric / total corneal power under- / overestimates the postoperative CASIA keratometric / real corneal power by 0.12 dpt / 0.21 dpt. The prediction of postoperative CASIA real power from preoperative IOLM or CASIA keratometry shows that postoperative total corneal power is systematically (0.18 dpt / 0.27 dpt) shifted towards astigmatism against the rule, which is not reflected by keratometry. The correlation of postoperative CASIA real power to the corresponding preoperative CASIA values is better than those as compared to the preoperative IOLM keratometry. However, there is a large variation from preoperative IOLM or CASIA keratometry to the postoperative CASIA real power of up to 1.1 dpt (95% confidence interval). Conclusion One of the challenges of tIOL calculation is the prediction of postoperative total corneal power from preoperative keratometry. Keratometric power restricted to a front surface measurement does not fully reflect the situation of corneal back surface astigmatism, which typically adds some extra against the rule astigmatism.
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288316
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288316
Link zu diesem Datensatz: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-410780
hdl:20.500.11880/36865
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-41078
ISSN: 1932-6203
Datum des Eintrags: 14-Nov-2023
Fakultät: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Fachrichtung: M - Augenheilkunde
Professur: M - Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dipl.-Ing. Achim Langenbucher
M - Prof. Dr. med. Nóra Szentmáry
Sammlung:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
journal.pone.0288316.pdf1,86 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons