Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen:
doi:10.22028/D291-41847
Titel: | Comparison of three creatinine-based equations to predict adverse outcome in a cardiovascular high-risk cohort: an investigation using the SPRINT research materials |
VerfasserIn: | Emrich, Insa E. Pickering, John W. Götzinger, Felix Kramann, Rafael Kunz, Michael Lauder, Lucas Papademetriou, Vasilios Böhm, Michael Heine, Gunnar H. Mahfoud, Felix |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Titel: | Clinical Kidney Journal |
Bandnummer: | 17 |
Heft: | 2 |
Verlag/Plattform: | Oxford University Press |
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2024 |
Freie Schlagwörter: | cardiovascular risk prediction CKD-EPI 2009 equation CKD-EPI 2021 equation classification estimated glomerular filtration rate European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation |
DDC-Sachgruppe: | 610 Medizin, Gesundheit |
Dokumenttyp: | Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel |
Abstract: | Background. Novel creatinine-based equations have recently been proposed but their predictive performance for cardiovascular outcomes in participants at high cardiovascular risk in comparison to the established CKD-EPI 2009 equation is unknown. Method. In 9361 participants from the United States included in the randomized controlled SPRINT trial, we calculated baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the CKD-EPI 2009, CKD-EPI 2021, and EKFC equations and compared their predictive value of cardiovascular events. The statistical metric used is the net reclassification improvement (NRI) presented separately for those with and those without events. Results. During a mean follow-up of 3.1 ± 0.9 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 559 participants (6.0%). When using the CKD-EPI 2009, the CKD-EPI 2021, and the EKFC equations, the prevalence of CKD (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or >60 ml/min/1.73 m2 with an ACR ≥30 mg/g) was 37% vs. 35.3% (P = 0.02) vs. 46.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. The corresponding mean eGFR was 72.5 ± 20.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 73.2 ± 19.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001) vs. 64.6 ± 17.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001). Neither reclassification according to the CKD-EPI 2021 equation [CKD-EPI 2021 vs. CKD-EPI 2009: NRIevents: −9.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) −13.0% to −5.9%); NRInonevents: 4.8% (95% CI 3.9% to 5.7%)], nor reclassification according to the EKFC equation allowed better prediction of cardiovascular events compared to the CKD-EPI 2009 equation (EKFC vs. CKD-EPI 2009: NRIevents: 31.2% (95% CI 27.5% to 35.0%); NRInonevents: −31.1% (95% CI −32.1% to −30.1%)). Conclusion. Substituting the CKD-EPI 2009 with the CKD-EPI 2021 or the EKFC equation for calculation of eGFR in participants with high cardiovascular risk without diabetes changed the prevalence of CKD but was not associated with improved risk prediction of cardiovascular events for both those with and without the event. |
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: | 10.1093/ckj/sfae011 |
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: | https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae011 |
Link zu diesem Datensatz: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-418472 hdl:20.500.11880/37445 http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-41847 |
ISSN: | 2048-8505 |
Datum des Eintrags: | 4-Apr-2024 |
Bezeichnung des in Beziehung stehenden Objekts: | Supplementary data |
In Beziehung stehendes Objekt: | https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/ckj/17/2/10.1093_ckj_sfae011/1/sfae011_supplemental_file.docx?Expires=1715245244&Signature=EOdGS3XYdbI4yu7vyNhYjFe-MnOcSRh1gWKdPAT6WpcFEr4eg9EqAqmWK-kxe8VQp3YTnrdkpM-l55U-4j~xvKu5a3LccOOgaI4QdHGai9jJGB-taFP0pwBDhho67WK3s-QaRlHiO-1If5ViTT1vE-pPXTRzdv81IaJ4TKLp8TJkFdflQVm8CmIP2fgASgXmWBZMBj5cuIGA6yhzfva3oOQutbi5BLTIbuyp618-IcC8WGJVjkaC7WfWsKt9vnq822J2EEahVoA6pUBZ3QQCEE~pVyuAfX~Ua3DoK8KGLmMzx21t5y9NFaL9Mu0lN3mA4IkRBd~hq8rBuSV87Hb4cA__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA |
Fakultät: | M - Medizinische Fakultät |
Fachrichtung: | M - Innere Medizin |
Professur: | M - Prof. Dr. Michael Böhm |
Sammlung: | SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes |
Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
sfae011.pdf | 1,34 MB | Adobe PDF | Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons