Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen: doi:10.22028/D291-48336
Titel: Review Article: Targeting Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in Primary Biliary Cholangitis
VerfasserIn: Schattenberg, Jörn M.
Banales, Jesus M.
Hirschfield, Gideon
Trivedi, Palak
Cable, Edward E.
McWherter, Charles A.
Billin, Andrew N.
Crittenden, Daria B
Budas, Grant
Sprache: Englisch
Titel: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Bandnummer: 63
Heft: 9
Seiten: 1215-1235
Verlag/Plattform: Wiley
Erscheinungsjahr: 2026
Freie Schlagwörter: bezafibrate
delpars
fenofibrate
glitazars
pemafibratepruritussaroglitazar
DDC-Sachgruppe: 610 Medizin, Gesundheit
Dokumenttyp: Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel
Abstract: Background: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, immune- mediated liver disease characterised by cholestasis, progressive fibrosis and symptoms of pruritus and fatigue. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is first- line therapy; however, many patients respond inadequately or are intolerant. Peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor (PPAR) agonists have emerged as second- line options. Aims: This review examines PPAR isoform (PPAR- α, PPAR- δ and PPAR- γ) mediated pathways relevant to PBC, and structural, biochemical and clinical efficacy and safety features of PPAR agonists for PBC. Methods: Preclinical studies on therapeutic PPAR agonism and clinical literature on PPAR agonists in PBC were identified through targeted PubMed searches and manual reference screening. Results: PPAR- α and PPAR- δ agonism improve cholestasis by reducing bile acid synthesis and inflammation. PPAR- α agonism also enhances bile acid detoxification and transport, while PPAR- δ agonism improves cholestatic pruritus by reducing pruri togenic signals. Individual PPAR isoforms are also associated with different safety profiles, with PPAR- α agonism linked to hepatic and muscle signals, and PPAR- γ agonism associated with fluid retention/weight gain. PPAR agonists differ in isoform selectivity. Although all agonists used in PBC reduce alkaline phosphatase levels, their impact on pruritus varies; PPAR- α pre dominant agonists (off- label fibrates, elafibranor) have a potential anti- pruritic effect, while selective PPAR- δ agonist, seladelpar, has demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pruritus. Fatigue is likely multifactorial, mediated through central nervous system effects and sleep disturbance; PPAR- α and PPAR- δ agents offer possible benefit. Conclusions: Isoform selectivity contributes to the efficacy and safety profiles of PPAR agonists. Future research should inves tigate isoform- specific mechanisms, particularly regarding symptom relief and agent- and class- related toxicities.
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: 10.1111/apt.70598
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70598
Link zu diesem Datensatz: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-483362
hdl:20.500.11880/42267
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-48336
ISSN: 1365-2036
0269-2813
Datum des Eintrags: 23-Jul-2026
Fakultät: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Fachrichtung: M - Innere Medizin
Professur: M - Prof. Dr. Jörn Schattenberg
Sammlung:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes



Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons