Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-41074
Title: Evaluation of the Qvella FAST System and the FAST-PBC cartridge for rapid species identification and antimicrobial resistance testing directly from positive blood cultures
Author(s): Sy, Issa
Bühler, Nina
Becker, Sören L.
Jung, Philipp
Language: English
Title: Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Volume: 61
Issue: 10
Publisher/Platform: American Society for Microbiology
Year of Publication: 2023
Free key words: bloodstream infection
blood culture
diagnosis
antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Qvella FAST System
matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)
MicroScan WalkAway
disk diffusion
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Blood culture diagnostics require rapid and accurate identification (ID) of pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Standard procedures, involving conventional cultivation on agar plates, may take up to 48 hours or more until AST completion. Recent approaches aim to shorten the processing time of positive blood cultures (PBC). The FAST System is a new technology, capable of purifying and con centrating bacterial/fungal pathogens from positive blood culture media and produc ing a bacterial suspension called “liquid colony” (LC), which can be further used in downstream analyses (e.g., ID and AST). Here, we evaluated the performance of the FAST System LC generated from PBC in comparison to our routine workflow includ ing ID by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry using Sepsityper, AST by automatized MicroScan WalkAway plus and directly inocula ted disk diffusion (DD), and MICRONAUT-AM for yeast/fungi. A total of 261 samples were analyzed, of which 86.6% (226/261) were eligible for the comparative ID and AST analyses. In comparison to the reference technique (culture-grown colonies), ID concordance of the FAST System LC and Sepsityper was 150/154 (97.4%) and 123/154 (79.9%), respectively, for Gram positive; 67/70 (95.7%) and 64/70 (91.4%), respectively, for Gram negative. For AST, categorical agreement (CA) of the FAST System LC in comparison to the routine workflow for Gram-positive bacteria was 96.1% and 98.7% for MicroScan and DD, respectively. Similar results were obtained for Gram-negative bacteria with 96.6% and 97.5% of CA for MicroScan and DD, respectively. Taken together, the FAST System LC allowed the laboratory to significantly reduce the time to obtain correct ID and AST (automated MicroScan) results 1 day earlier and represents a promising tool to expedite the processing of PBC.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1128/jcm.00569-23
URL of the first publication: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00569-23
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-410741
hdl:20.500.11880/36861
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-41074
ISSN: 1098-660X
0095-1137
Date of registration: 14-Nov-2023
Description of the related object: Supplemental Material
Related object: https://journals.asm.org/doi/suppl/10.1128/jcm.00569-23/suppl_file/jcm.00569-23-s0001.pdf
https://journals.asm.org/doi/suppl/10.1128/jcm.00569-23/suppl_file/jcm.00569-23-s0002.pdf
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Infektionsmedizin
Professorship: M - Prof. Dr. Sören Becker
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons