Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-42222
Title: Apheresis treatment in autoimmune neurological diseases: Predictors of good clinical outcome and success of follow-up therapy with B-cell depletion
Author(s): Fousse, Mathias
Fassbender, Klaus
Schunk, Stefan J.
Schmidt, Tina
Stögbauer, Jakob
Language: English
Title: Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Volume: 461
Publisher/Platform: Elsevier
Year of Publication: 2024
Free key words: Plasma exchange
Therapeutic apheresis
Plasmapheresis
Immunoadsorption
Neurological autoimmune disease
B cell depletion
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Objective: Apheresis treatment (AT) is an established standard of treatment in various neurological autoimmune diseases. Since not all patients equally benefit from AT, we saw the need to investigate the effect of different clinical, paraclinical and technical-apparative factors on the clinical outcome. Additionally, we wanted to find out whether patients who improved due to AT continue to be clinically stable under B-cell depletion (BCD). Methods: We screened all patients (n = 358) with neurological diseases who received AT at the Medical center of the University of the Saarland in the past 20 years. Different factors (e.g., age, sex, duration until onset of AT, type of AT, number of cycles, csf parameters) were analyzed retrospectively. Clinical disability was measured using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), visual acuity and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Results: 335 patients, categorized into 11 different autoimmune diagnosis groups, received a total of 2669 treatment cycles and showed a statistically significant improvement in mRS with AT (p < 0.001). Patients in American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) categories I (p = 0.013) and II (p = 0.035) showed a significantly greater benefit under AT than those in category III. The clinical outcome was better with shorter duration until AT onset, more cycles of AT, and more plasma volume exchanged and the presence of an autoimmune antibody. Patients who initially profited had a significantly more stable course of the disease after 1-Year-BCD (p = 0.039). Discussion: In the present study, we were able to identify various significant factors influencing the outcome of patients due to AT. Furthermore, we could show that patients with a response to AT can benefit from BCD followup therapy.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123050
URL of the first publication: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2024.123050
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-422220
hdl:20.500.11880/37901
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-42222
ISSN: 0022-510X
Date of registration: 20-Jun-2024
Description of the related object: Supplementary data
Related object: https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0022510X24001850-mmc1.docx
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Infektionsmedizin
M - Innere Medizin
M - Neurologie und Psychiatrie
Professorship: M - Prof. Dr. Klaus Faßbender
M - Prof. Dr. Danilo Fliser
M - Keiner Professur zugeordnet
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0022510X24001850-main.pdf2,12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons