Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-46634
Title: Do Dogs Really Influence How People Evaluate Psychotherapists? A Conceptual Replication Attempt
Author(s): Braun, Moritz N.
Issler, Tobias C.
Schanz, Tobias C.
Roxanne Sopp, M.
Michael, Tanja
Lass-Hennemann, Johanna
Language: English
Title: Anthrozoös
Volume: 38
Issue: 5
Pages: 883-898
Publisher/Platform: Taylor & Francis
Year of Publication: 2025
Free key words: Animal-assisted psychotherapy
animal-assisted therapy
human–animal interaction
icebreaker effect
therapeutic alliance
DDC notations: 150 Psychology
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: The icebreaker effect – the idea that integrating animals into psychotherapy improves the therapeutic alliance – is believed to be one of the main mechanisms of action in animal-assisted psychotherapy. Support for this notion has come from preliminary evidence that the presence of a dog positively influences how people perceive psychotherapists. However, the robustness and generalizability of these findings have yet to be tested. Thus, in our study, we aimed to (1) conceptually replicate these results and (2) gain insight into what might drive them by employing a design with high experimental control. Four hundred and eighty-one participants took part in our experiment, in which they first watched a video of a psychotherapist introducing themself. In the video, we experimentally manipulated whether the psychotherapist had an additional qualification in animal-assisted therapy or in meditation techniques and mindfulness (as a control condition), whether the psychotherapist referred to this additional qualification in the video, whether this additional qualification was visible in the video (dog or meditation accessories visible), and the psychotherapist's gender. After watching the video, participants were asked to report on the anticipated therapeutic relationship, the perceived trustworthiness of the therapist, and their own willingness to self-disclose. None of our analyses yielded any evidence of positive effects from the presence of a dog in the video. Thus, we could not replicate the previous results. Given our design, we argue that our results suggest that it is neither the mere presence of the dog (i.e., the visibility of the dog in the video) nor the perception of the psychotherapist's ability to work with a dog as an additional qualification that drove the previously found positive effects. Instead, we discuss the idea that these positive effects might be due to (potentially unconscious) changes in psychotherapists’ behavior and performance when accompanied by a dog. We invite future research to investigate (1) the role that therapists’ behavioral changes due to the presence of a dog play and (2) under which circumstances these changes occur.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1080/08927936.2025.2482327
URL of the first publication: https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2025.2482327
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-466345
hdl:20.500.11880/40877
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-46634
ISSN: 1753-0377
0892-7936
Date of registration: 4-Dec-2025
Faculty: HW - Fakultät für Empirische Humanwissenschaften und Wirtschaftswissenschaft
Department: HW - Psychologie
Professorship: HW - Prof. Dr. Tanja Michael
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
Do Dogs Really Influence How People Evaluate Psychotherapists A Conceptual Replication Attempt.pdf881,42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons