Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-46711
Title: Microsatellite Instability Status and Mismatch Repair Defects Testing in Endometrial Cancer—Insights from the Multicenter E-PEC Trial
Author(s): Eser, Büsra
Papior, David
Salmanton-García, Jon
Cornely, Oliver A.
Morgenstern, Bernd
Herpel, Clarissa
Radosa, Julia C.
Almuheimid, Anas
Aktas, Bahriye
Weydandt, Laura
Wittenborn, Julia
Meyer-Wilmes, Philipp
Friebe, Verena
Leidinger, Christiane
Kimmig, Rainer
Thangarajah, Fabinshy
Language: English
Title: Diagnostics
Volume: 16 (2026)
Issue: 1
Publisher/Platform: MDPI
Year of Publication: 2025
Free key words: endometrial cancer
microsatellite instability
mismatch repair-testing
molecular characterization
immune checkpoint inhibition
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background: Mismatch repair (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) testing have become essential biomarkers in the molecular classification of endometrial cancer (EC), guiding adjuvant treatment decisions and eligibility for immune checkpoint inhibition. Although international guidelines recommend universal testing, real-world implemen tation remains heterogeneous. This study aimed to evaluate trends in MMR and MSI testing and associated molecular diagnostics in Germany between 2018 and 2022. Methods: A retrospective multicenter analysis was conducted across German tertiary care centers. Data from patients with histologically confirmed EC between 2018 and 2022 were extracted from standardized electronic pathology records. Annual testing rates for MSI, MMR, POLE, TP53, and L1CAM were analyzed using descriptive statistics and trend analysis (Chi square test for trend, p < 0.05). Therapeutic data were collected to assess the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Results: There was a significant increase in the annual rates of molecular testing for MSI, POLE, TP53, and L1CAM over the five-year observation period (all p < 0.05). TP53 testing showed the highest increase (13.1% → 78.6%), while MSI testing rose from 82.9% to 97.4%. Both POLE and L1CAM testing were virtually absent in 2018 (0% and 1.6%) but reached 15.7% by 2022. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a rapid and substantial implementation of MMR and MSI testing in German clinical practice, reflecting successful translation of trial results into routine care. However, implementation of testing in guidelines appeared time-shifted. For bridging this gap, annual guideline updates seem to be necessary.
DOI of the first publication: 10.3390/diagnostics16010100
URL of the first publication: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16010100
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-467111
hdl:20.500.11880/40993
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-46711
ISSN: 2075-4418
Date of registration: 21-Jan-2026
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Frauenheilkunde
Professorship: M - Keiner Professur zugeordnet
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
diagnostics-16-00100-v2.pdf817,11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons