Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
doi:10.22028/D291-48520 | Title: | Ruling In and Ruling Out Sepsis Using Likelihood Ratios of a Host Response Assay |
| Author(s): | Navalkar, Krupa Arun Wani, Prashant Davis, Roy F. Cermelli, Silvia Dietrich, Maximilian von der Forst, Maik Becker, Sören L. Benthien, Sophia Baumann, Elisa Zeiner, Carsten Lepper, Philipp M. Garnacho-Montero, José Cantón-Bulnes, María Luisa Fernández-Galilea, Adela García-Garmendia, Jose Luis Estella, Ángel Miller, Russell R. Schultz, Marcus J. Rothman, Richard Burke, John Patel, Gourang Parada, Jorge Yager, Thomas D. Brandon, Richard B. |
| Language: | English |
| Title: | Diagnostics |
| Volume: | 16 |
| Issue: | 15 |
| Publisher/Platform: | MDPI |
| Year of Publication: | 2026 |
| Free key words: | sepsis SeptiCyte RAPID likelihood ratio host-response biomarker systemic inflammatory response syndrome SeptiScore diagnostic accuracy blood culture intensive care unit gene expression |
| DDC notations: | 610 Medicine and health |
| Publikation type: | Journal Article |
| Abstract: | Overview: SeptiCyte RAPID is an FDA-cleared gene expression test that quantifies host immune response to aid in the diagnosis of sepsis. The test yields a score (the SeptiScore) ranging from 0–15, distributed across four bands (1–4) based on increased likelihood of sepsis. Each band can be characterized by average positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR−, respectively) for the discrimination of sepsis versus the non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a combined cohort of critically ill patients suspected of sepsis (n = 889), recruited across 19 hospitals in the USA and Europe. The analysis quantified the LR+ and LR− parameters as a function of SeptiScore, for discrimination of sepsis vs. SIRS in patients admitted to ICU. Hypotheses: (1) The likelihood ratio (LR) framework provides a clinically useful interpretive approach that complements the previously used SeptiScore banding scheme; (2) Low Band 1 SeptiScores are associated with sufficiently small LR− to support the use of SeptiCyte RAPID as a rule-out test for sepsis; (3) High Band 4 SeptiScores are associated with sufficiently large LR+ to support the use of SeptiCyte RAPID as a rule-in test for sepsis; and (4) SeptiScore-derived LR+ and LR− values can be combined with estimates of pre-test probability (derived from patient characteristics and/or other diagnostic tests) to generate individualized, patient-specific post-test probabilities of sepsis. Results: The SeptiCyte RAPID test demonstrates strong diagnostic performance in distinguishing sepsis from SIRS. The likelihood ratios across different score bands provide clear clinical utility: the median LR+ was 3.26 (range 2.57–4.24) for Band 3, and 6.97 (range 4.35–15.57) for Band 4, providing evidence toward ruling in sepsis at high SeptiScores. Conversely, the median LR− was 0.16 (range 0.14–0.20) for Band 2 and 0.085 (range 0.014–0.16) for Band 1, providing evidence toward ruling out sepsis at low SeptiScores. A higher-resolution analysis of SeptiCyte RAPID performance confirmed these trends by evaluating LR+ and LR− at specific values within each band. The sepsis group was further stratified according to whether patients were classified as blood culture positive (BC+) or blood culture negative (BC−), and the detailed LR+ and LR− analyses were repeated. A monotonic increase in likelihood ratio with increasing SeptiScore was consistently observed, independent of whether sepsis patients were culture-positive, culture-negative, or unstratified with respect to blood culture status. Conclusions: High SeptiScores have correspondingly high LR+ values, and low SeptiScores have correspondingly low LR− values, both of which may have clinical utility. High likelihood ratios for Band 4 SeptiScores, which precede traditional microbiology results, may provide clinicians with early confidence of a sepsis diagnosis and microbiology diagnostic stewardship. Low likelihood ratios for Band 1 SeptiScores may prompt clinicians to consider an alternate diagnosis to sepsis. These are diagnostic-performance-based observations; whether they translate into fewer missed diagnoses or more efficient use of hospital resources has not been directly assessed in this study and will require dedicated clinical outcome studies. |
| DOI of the first publication: | 10.3390/diagnostics16152450 |
| URL of the first publication: | https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16152450 |
| Link to this record: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-485200 hdl:20.500.11880/42410 http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-48520 |
| ISSN: | 2075-4418 |
| Date of registration: | 14-Aug-2026 |
| Description of the related object: | Supplementary Materials |
| Related object: | https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics16152450/s1 |
| Faculty: | M - Medizinische Fakultät |
| Department: | M - Infektionsmedizin M - Innere Medizin |
| Professorship: | M - Prof. Dr. Robert Bals M - Prof. Dr. Sören Becker |
| Collections: | SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes |
Files for this record:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| diagnostics-16-02450.pdf | 9,98 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License

