Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-40625
Title: Accuracy of Personalized Computed Tomographic 3D Templating for Acetabular Cup Placement in Revision Arthroplasty
Author(s): Winter, Philipp
Fritsch, Ekkehard
Tschernig, Thomas
Goebel, Lars
Wolf, Milan
Müller, Manuel
Weise, Julius J.
Orth, Patrick
Landgraeber, Stefan
Language: English
Title: Medicina
Volume: 59
Issue: 9
Publisher/Platform: MDPI
Year of Publication: 2023
Free key words: revision arthroplasty
hip (joint)
acetabular cup
2D
3D
computed tomography
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background: Revision hip arthroplasty presents a surgical challenge, necessitating meticulous preoperative planning to avert complications like periprosthetic fractures and aseptic loosening. Historically, assessment of the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) templating has focused exclusively on primary hip arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we examined the accuracy of 3D templating for acetabular revision cups in 30 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty. Utilizing computed tomography scans of the patients’ pelvis and 3D templates of the implants (Aesculap Plasmafit, B. Braun; Aesculap Plasmafit Revision, B. Braun; Avantage Acetabular System, Zimmerbiomet, EcoFit 2M, Implantcast; Tritanium Revision, Stryker), we performed 3D templating and positioned the acetabular cup implants accordingly. To evaluate accuracy, we compared the planned sizes of the acetabular cups in 2D and 3D with the sizes implanted during surgery. Results: An analysis was performed to examine potential influences on templating accuracy, specifically considering factors such as gender and body mass index (BMI). Significant statistical differences (p < 0.001) in the accuracy of size prediction were observed between 3D and 2D templating. Personalized 3D templating exhibited an accuracy rate of 66.7% for the correct prediction of the size of the acetabular cup, while 2D templating achieved an exact size prediction in only 26.7% of cases. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2D and 3D templating methods regarding gender or BMI. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that 3D templating improves the accuracy of predicting acetabular cup sizes in revision arthroplasty when compared to 2D templating. However, it should be noted that the predicted implant size generated through 3D templating tended to overestimate the implanted implant size by an average of 1.3 sizes.
DOI of the first publication: 10.3390/medicina59091608
URL of the first publication: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091608
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-406250
hdl:20.500.11880/36529
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-40625
ISSN: 1648-9144
Date of registration: 29-Sep-2023
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Anatomie und Zellbiologie
M - Orthopädie
Professorship: M - Prof. Dr. Stefan Landgraeber
M - Prof. Dr. Henning Madry
M - Prof. Dr. Carola Meier
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
medicina-59-01608.pdf3,97 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons